Google Ads for shipyards
Campaign structure, matched landing pages and conversion tracking built around live build and refit capacity — by a studio that runs marine platforms of its own.
Google Ads for shipyards decides whether your refit and build-slot budget converts high-intent owners into signed project contracts, or quietly burns spend on searches that were never going to commission real work. A yard's capacity fills and empties by season and by project size, and generic PPC management — one broad campaign and a single contact page — wastes budget on searches that do not match what an owner actually needs this quarter. Marine Marketing International runs Google Ads for shipyards as a tightly structured system: campaigns built around real search intent by project type and vessel size, landing pages matched to the exact ad an owner clicked, and conversion tracking that shows which keywords actually produce signed contracts, not just clicks. We operate boatrentalbalearics.com, brokerbarche.com and yachtbrokersgreece.com, so every campaign structure recommended here is tested on our own live spend, not theorised.
Fast facts
A yard does not sell one product, it sells a calendar of build and refit slots across vessel sizes, and a single broad campaign pointed at a generic homepage cannot match the specific intent behind a search for a particular project type or vessel length. Google Ads for shipyards has to be structured around that specificity: campaigns segmented by project type and vessel size, ad copy that matches the exact search, and landing pages that show the capability an owner actually searched for, not a generic services page.
The practical consequences follow from that structure. Keyword targeting needs to reflect real owner search behaviour — by project type, vessel size and region — rather than generic terms that waste spend on unqualified clicks. Negative keywords need constant maintenance, because a yard's ads can easily be shown for searches with no commercial intent if the account is not actively managed. And Quality Score, which directly affects cost per click, depends on landing page relevance, so a mismatched page quietly inflates every click's cost.
Consider two yards spending the same monthly budget. The one running Google Ads for shipyards as a structured system spends efficiently because Quality Score is high and every click lands on a relevant page, converting a larger share of that spend into signed contracts. The other runs broad, loosely targeted campaigns, pays more per click due to poor Quality Score, and converts a smaller share of a larger spend.

Google's ad auction rewards relevance: a tightly themed ad group, ad copy that matches the search, and a landing page that delivers on the ad's promise all lift Quality Score and lower cost per click. An account built without this structure pays more for every click regardless of budget size, because the auction penalises mismatch directly.
Owners clicking an ad need the same match, delivered instantly: the capability promised in the ad copy, current slot availability, and a clear way to enquire without hunting through an unrelated capabilities page. Google Ads for shipyards that wins the click but loses the owner on a mismatched landing page is only half finished, and it is the more expensive half to get wrong since the click was already paid for.
This dual requirement, satisfying both the auction and the owner, is why Google Ads for shipyards cannot be delegated to a generic PPC template. The keyword patterns, landing page structure and negative-keyword discipline that matter are specific to a yard's build and refit calendar and rarely understood outside it.
Seasonality compounds this further. Search volume for winter refit slots and spring commissioning shifts through the year as owners plan projects around the sailing season, and a campaign left on autopilot misses both the seasonal surges worth bidding harder into and the quiet periods where budget should pull back. Reviewing and adjusting bid strategy against that seasonal pattern, rather than running a flat monthly budget regardless of demand, is part of what separates a managed account from a set-and-forget one.
The conversion-winning machinery is specific to a yard's build and refit calendar. Campaigns and ad groups structured by project type and vessel size, so no search competes against an unrelated capability. Landing pages matched to each ad group, showing the exact capability an owner searched for. Negative keyword lists maintained weekly, so budget stops leaking to irrelevant searches. And conversion tracking that follows a click through to an enquiry and, wherever possible, a signed contract, so optimisation is based on revenue signals, not just click-through rate.
Around that machinery sits the technical layer: fast-loading landing pages, because Google penalises slow pages in both Quality Score and the owner's patience, and clear enquiry forms that keep momentum from an expensive click. This is where our marine website design work and our Google Ads work overlap deliberately: a yard site built to convert makes every paid click worth what it costs.

The brief we hold every Google Ads for shipyards campaign against — each element, its commercial job, and the standard it must meet.
| Element | Commercial job | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Campaign structure | Match ads to real search intent | Segmented by project type & vessel size |
| Landing pages | Convert clicks into enquiries | Matched to each ad group's capability |
| Negative keywords | Stop budget leaking to junk clicks | Reviewed and updated weekly |
| Quality Score | Lower cost per click | Actively managed, not left to default |
| Conversion tracking | Prove which keywords sign contracts | Enquiries & contracts tracked to source |
| Reporting | Justify and refine spend | Cost per signed contract reported monthly |
Most yard ad spend is wasted on a single broad campaign when the real revenue engine is a tightly segmented structure: separate campaigns and ad groups by project type and vessel size, each with its own landing page and negative keyword list. Google Ads for shipyards that treats structure as the foundation outperforms accounts built around a handful of generic keywords.
Ours is engineered around a proven anatomy: ad groups themed tightly enough that every keyword in the group shares the same real intent; landing pages that show the exact capability promised in the ad, updated as slot availability turns over; negative keyword lists that expand every week as new irrelevant search terms are identified; and conversion tracking that follows a click through enquiry to signed contract, not just to a form submission. Around the structure sits machinery owners never see: UTM tracking on every ad, a CRM that attributes each enquiry to its source campaign and keyword, and monthly reporting that shows which project categories are actually converting paid clicks into signed work.

The commercial case for professionally managed Google Ads for shipyards is not folklore; it is measured. Stanford’s web-credibility research found that around 75% of users judge a company’s credibility from its website design alone, and an expensive paid click that lands on a weak page wastes the spend that earned it. Google’s own research puts the first visual impression at about 50 milliseconds, and found that 53% of mobile visitors abandon pages that take longer than three seconds to load; industry conversion studies consistently price each extra second of delay at roughly 7% of conversions, a cost that hits a paid click twice, once in wasted spend and once in a lower Quality Score. For a yard, the arithmetic is direct: a single refit or build contract can be worth tens of thousands of euros, so if better-structured Google Ads for shipyards converts even one additional enquiry into a signed contract per quarter, it repays the management fee many times over, before counting the lower cost per click that a well-structured account earns automatically.
These returns compound in a way an unmanaged account cannot. A well-structured campaign keeps improving Quality Score over time as conversion data accumulates, steadily lowering cost per click, while a neglected account drifts the opposite direction as irrelevant searches and stale ad copy erode relevance. Yards that invest in ongoing management find their cost per signed contract falls steadily as the account matures.
The same arithmetic works in reverse. A yard running an unmanaged or loosely structured account is not simply spending inefficiently, it is paying a premium for every click through a depressed Quality Score while converting a smaller share of that expensive traffic. That loss rarely shows up as a single bad month; it shows up as a slowly rising cost per enquiry that nobody traces back to campaign structure.
One accountable service: campaign and ad group structure built around project type and vessel size; landing pages matched to each ad group; negative keyword management; conversion tracking tied to enquiries and signed contracts; ongoing bid and budget optimisation; and monthly reporting tied to cost per signed contract, not just clicks. Campaign build starts from €4,500 with management typically €1,000 to €2,500 a month, priced fixed and quoted in writing before work begins.
After the initial build, most yards keep us managing the account monthly, refreshing ad groups as slot availability turns over and tightening negative keywords as the data accumulates. Read our story to see why that stewardship model exists.

We do not ask yards to trust a portfolio in the abstract. We operate boatrentalbalearics.com, brokerbarche.com and yachtbrokersgreece.com, and our own paid campaigns compete for the same owners yours do. When we specify a campaign structure or a negative-keyword pattern in a client account, it is the version that won on our own platforms after the losing versions cost us real budget. Standards and market context come from the industry bodies we follow — ICOMIA, European Boating Industry and British Marine — not generic marketing folklore.
That operating experience is also why our scopes are precise: we know which campaign structures actually sign refit and build contracts for a given yard size and capability mix, which keywords produce enquiries, and which are merely activity, and we quote every proposal itemised against outcomes rather than deliverable jargon. We track every enquiry back to the campaign and keyword that produced it, so the reporting we send is a record of contract pipeline, not a list of clicks delivered.
MMI Google Ads for shipyards campaign build starts from €4,500, with ongoing management typically €1,000 to €2,500 a month plus ad spend, which is billed separately at cost. Pricing is fixed and quoted in writing before work begins.
Self-managed boosting typically uses broad, unstructured targeting and a single landing page. A managed account is segmented by project type and vessel size with matched landing pages and active negative keyword management, which lowers cost per click and raises conversion rate.
Yes. We manage campaign setup, ongoing bid optimisation and reporting, with ad spend billed separately at cost and management fees fixed in the monthly programme.
New project types can be added to the relevant ad group within a day of going live, so paid visibility starts almost immediately rather than waiting for a periodic campaign refresh.
Every click is tracked through to enquiry and, wherever possible, signed contract, so monthly reporting shows cost per signed contract by campaign and keyword, not just clicks or impressions.